Table 3: Effect Size Scale.
|
Effect Size | % of average change for Outdoor Education |
Amount of Change Rating |
below 0 0 to 0.055 0.056 to 0.165 0.166 to 0.275 0.276 to 0.385 0.386 to 0.495 0.496 to 0.605 0.606 to 0.715 0.716 to 0.825 0.826 to 0.935 above 0.935 |
below 0% 1 - 25% 26 - 75% 76 - 125% 126 - 175% 176 - 225% 226 - 275% 276 - 325% 326 - 375% 376 - 425% above 425% |
No Change Doubtful Below Average Average Above Average High Very High Outstanding Very Outstanding Exceptional Very Exceptional |
Examination of the effect sizes for the program reveals that overall, a ‘very high’ degree of change was achieved for the participants. In examining the program objectives, it is pleasing to see the area of Social Competence reported as "high." Considering our client group, we are looking for indications of changes such as this, where the participants have displayed an ability to learn from each other in a supportive social environment. This may well result from the greater amount of social interaction necessary for participation on an outdoor education experience. Tasks such as cooking, making camp, navigating, and learning through new experience, demand greater social interaction. The reported improvement in Social Competence, if sustained, should be a valuable gain for the participants as they face future challenges. Included in the "high" range were the areas of Time Management and Task Leadership which indicates that our goal of teamwork was effectively met. The participants’ self-reported increase in their ability to manage time suggests greater self-sufficiency.
The "outstanding and very high" rating results in the categories of Achievement Motivation and Emotional Control suggest an increase in the participant’s motivations to achieve and succeed. This indicates that their ability to push limits and overcome obstacles may have improved, and that they are perhaps less fearful and stressed under these circumstances.
The smallest changes were "below average" (compared to results for other outdoor education programs) and were found for Self Confidence, Active Initiative and Intellectual Flexibility. The "below average" findings for Self Confidence and Intellectual Flexibility appear to be partly a result of these scales having large standard deviations - in other words, there was a wide spread of individual scores, which caused an overall reduction in the effect size. A larger sample size, on the same program, may well have produced stronger results for these categories. The "below average" result for Intellectual Flexibility is a reasonable finding, particularly given that development of academic ability or thinking skills was not set as on objective and consequently the program was not designed to effect a large change in this area. The "no change" result for Active Initiative is difficult to understand as it is an unusual finding. I can only suggest that the "experiential" perspective of the program saw all the participants engaging in a range of completely new and challenging (perhaps perceived as dangerous or threatening) activities. We must also take into account that this program is seen as a compliment to the ongoing "mainstream" rehabilitation process.
It must be emphasised that the results are to be considered as a pilot study. A full research report, at a minimum, would require follow-up testing and preferably utilise a larger sample size. Follow-up testing would determine whether the changes were long-lasting, or a function of what is known as ‘post-group euphoria’, that is, a warm feeling at the end of a group experience which fades on returning to normal life. Nevertheless, the results are very promising, and they reveal an overall increase in self-confidence and this indicates that participants finished the program feeling much better about themselves and their abilities.
Support a Program | Return to Main Page |
[The Program] | [Photographs] | [Analysis] | [Articles] | [Co-ordinator] | [Programs] |